US ‘acted inconsistently’ in use of zeroing in dumping cases WTO
Oct 03, 2008 | 11:36 AM
The World Trade Organization's Dispute Settlement Board (DSB) has ruled that the United States has "acted inconsistently" in the use of the practice of zeroing in antidumping cases.
The ruling recommended only that the DSB request the U.S. bring its measures into conformity with its obligations under Word Trade Organization (WTO) guidelines. The Geneva, Switzerland-based WTO declined to recommend how the U.S. should implement the DSB's recommendations and rulings.
"We cannot presume that members might act inconsistently with their WTO obligations in the implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings," the WTO said in its decision, rejecting a request by the European Commission, the plaintiff in the matter, to issue such a suggestion.
The finding of inconsistent action was met with calls from steel consumers and importers for the U.S. to discontinue zeroing, a practice they say artificially inflates dumping margins by disregarding negative dumping margins when calculating a margin of dumping for an imported product as a whole.....
To access AMM's full content, please log in below. If you do not have an AMM account, we invite you to take a free trial or subscribe below.
Already a registered amm.com user?
Access to amm.com editorial content is granted only to paid subscribers and trialists. If you do not have an active account in your own name, please either subscribe or take a trial and you will have instant access to amm.com content. Sharing your login credentials with individuals who are not subscribers represents a violation of AMM copyright.
Every morning, every minute no matter how often you follow the markets, there's an AMM subscription to fit your needs.
Not sure if you are ready to invest in a subscription right now? Take a free, no-obligation trial. Start your free trial today.