Scrap vs. waste distinction has left loopholes for abuse
Oct 28, 2005 | 08:45 AM
| Paul Schaffer
The U.S. scrap metal industry unwittingly created some loopholes for abuse with its 1990s success in severing some recyclables from waste management regulations, an environmental activist said last week.
Jim Puckett, coordinator of the Basel Action Network, said the distinction of scrap from waste makes sense in principle. However, he said the original, stronger provisions should have been left unchanged for material leaving the country, destined to be transformed or discarded by companies outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
"When we applied it internationally, it was a grievous error," Puckett said at the E-Scrap 2005 conference in Orlando Thursday.He later cited two rule changes by the EPA that have had a negative effect. One exempted circuit boards intended for recycling from certain hazardous waste provisions, while the other said shipments consisting mostly of certain base metals fall outside the code.....
To access AMM's full content, please log in below. If you do not have an AMM account, we invite you to take a free trial or subscribe below.
Already a registered amm.com user?
Access to amm.com editorial content is granted only to paid subscribers and trialists. If you do not have an active account in your own name, please either subscribe or take a trial and you will have instant access to amm.com content. Sharing your login credentials with individuals who are not subscribers represents a violation of AMM copyright.
Every morning, every minute no matter how often you follow the markets, there's an AMM subscription to fit your needs.
Not sure if you are ready to invest in a subscription right now? Take a free, no-obligation trial. Start your free trial today.