Search
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';', to a maximum of 5

  • By submitting this article to a friend we reserve the right to contact them regarding AMM subscriptions. Please ensure you have their consent before giving us their details.


Locked-out Lake Erie workers denied employment benefits

Jul 05, 2013 | 12:21 PM |

Tags  U.S> Steel Corp., USS, United Steelworkers union, USW, Lake Erie Works, Nanticoke, Service Canada


NEW YORK — Some 1,000 hourly workers locked out at U.S. Steel Corp.’s Lake Erie Works in Nanticoke, Ontario, could face mounting financial pressure after Canada’s federal government denied them employment insurance benefits.

United Steelworkers union Local 8782 was notified July 4 that Service Canada had decided to "disentitle" the insurance benefits related to being locked out of the steelmaking facility.

"The union strongly believes this was strictly a political decision and certainly not based on the facts or merits of the situation the workers face with a global company such as U.S. Steel and the manipulation of production levels south of the border in depressed market conditions," the union said in a statement.

The USW said it would file a formal request for reconsideration to Service Canada to initiate the appeal process for workers.

The lockout by the Pittsburgh-based steelmaker is approaching its 10th week after negotiations between the two parties failed at the end of April. While market participants previously indicated that the volume of production curtailed by the lockout was not significant enough to impact U.S. Steel’s overall supply/demand balance in the short term, the company’s automotive business reportedly has been stronger than expected.

The strength in autos, coupled with a reported delay in slab shipments to other mills by U.S. Steel due to the loss of melt capacity at Lake Erie, have contributed to the recent upward momentum in steel prices, sources said.

U.S. Steel could not be reached for comment.




Latest Pricing Trends Year Over Year

Poll

Should AMM increase its news coverage of Mexico? Should this also include pricing assessments? And should this be available in the current AMM daily or in a new product dedicated to Mexican coverage?

Yes, write more about Mexico in the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico and launch/increase Mexican pricing assessments in the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico in a new product and not the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico and launch/increase Mexican pricing assessments in a new product, not the current AMM daily.
No, leave things as they are and/or do not make major changes.


View previous results