Search
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';', to a maximum of 5

  • By submitting this article to a friend we reserve the right to contact them regarding AMM subscriptions. Please ensure you have their consent before giving us their details.


Exide pollution control plan rejected

Oct 28, 2013 | 12:38 PM |

Tags  Exide Technologies, AQMD, Barry Wallerstein, lead smelter, arsenic emissions, Nathan Laliberte


NEW YORK — Troubled battery maker Exide Technologies Ltd. has one month to develop a new health risk reduction plan for its lead smelting facility in Vernon, Calif., after California’s South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) rejected its initial proposal last week.

Milton, Ga.-based Exide was required to develop a risk reduction plan after an assessment earlier this year determined that it posed a health risk to more than 250,000 residents in southeast Los Angeles County, primarily due to arsenic emissions, according to the AQMD.

"Exide has taken initial steps to reduce its arsenic emissions," Barry R. Wallerstein, AQMD’s executive officer for the South Coast, said in a statement. "However, these steps, along with additional improvements proposed in their plan, are still not adequate to protect the health of residents in nearby communities."

The AQMD, in an Oct. 24 letter to Exide executives, outlined deficiencies in the battery maker’s risk reduction plan and suggested immediate upgrades to existing pollution control systems.

News of the rejection came just one week after AQMD attorneys filed a petition with an independent administrative law panel that would require Exide to shutter all lead smelting operations at the Vernon plant until its air pollution control systems are deemed adequate to control arsenic emissions (amm.com, Oct. 21).

The panel is expected to conduct hearings on the proposed order in December.

An Exide spokeswoman didn’t respond to a request for comment.




Latest Pricing Trends Year Over Year

Poll

After witnessing the pace of steel plant idlings and worker layoffs during the first half of the year, what is your view of the second half of 2015? (choose one)

No matter what else happens, layoffs and shutdowns, etc., have nearly or essentially stopped for the year.
The environment will change little and the pace of layoffs will continue at a similar rate as the first half of 2015.
The environment will change little yet the pace of layoffs will begin to slow slightly to moderately.
The environment will change little yet the pace of layoffs could exceed the rate seen thus far.
The environment will improve slightly to moderately yet hiring and plant restarts will not resume this year.
The environment will improve slightly to moderately, with hiring and plant restarts commencing.
The environment will improve dramatically yet hiring and plant restarts will still be negligible in comparison.
The environment will improve dramatically yet hiring and plant restarts will only be slight to moderate.
The environment will improve dramatically, with hiring and plant restarts occurring nearly in tandem.


View previous results