Search
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';', to a maximum of 5

  • By submitting this article to a friend we reserve the right to contact them regarding AMM subscriptions. Please ensure you have their consent before giving us their details.


Esmark delays decision on Yorkville

Nov 25, 2013 | 04:04 PM |

Tags  steel, Esmark, James Bouchard, TCC Steel, Ohio Coatings, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, WARN, Ohio Cold Rolling Catherine Ngai


NEW YORK — Esmark Inc. has delayed a decision concerning the restart its Yorkville, Ohio, facility due to poor economic conditions, according to its top executive.

Ohio Cold Rolling Co., which was originally part of defunct steelmaker RG Steel LLC, had been under discussion for a possible sale or joint venture in the summer. However, Esmark founder, chairman and chief executive officer James P. Bouchard told AMM Nov. 25 that the future of the Yorkville facility remains unclear.

"No decision has been made yet," he said. "Ohio Coatings (Co.) is doing great, but (Ohio Cold Rolling) is just idled." Ohio Coatings is a 50-50 tinplate joint venture with Seoul, South Korea-based TCC Steel Co.

The Sewickley, Pa.-based company had originally wanted to make a decision on Yorkville by the end of September so it could meet the December delivery timeframe for tin season. A new timeline was set for discussion at a Nov. 26 board meeting, Bouchard said.

Bouchard reaffirmed that the company is moving forward on downsizing of its facilities in order to cut down on capacity and right-size the organization (amm.com, Nov. 1).

According to a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice issued Nov. 1, the company will begin its first layoffs at its 300 East Joe Orr Road facility in Chicago Heights, Ill., between Dec. 31 and Jan. 14.

Bouchard noted that 29 workers will be affected.




Latest Pricing Trends Year Over Year

Poll

Should AMM increase its news coverage of Mexico? Should this also include pricing assessments? And should this be available in the current AMM daily or in a new product dedicated to Mexican coverage?

Yes, write more about Mexico in the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico and launch/increase Mexican pricing assessments in the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico in a new product and not the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico and launch/increase Mexican pricing assessments in a new product, not the current AMM daily.
No, leave things as they are and/or do not make major changes.


View previous results