Search
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';', to a maximum of 5

  • By submitting this article to a friend we reserve the right to contact them regarding AMM subscriptions. Please ensure you have their consent before giving us their details.


Legal wrangling continues over XL pipeline route in Neb.

Feb 26, 2014 | 06:01 PM | Thorsten Schier

Tags  TransCanada, Keystone XL, pipeline, Nebraska, David A. Domina, Thorsten Schier


NEW YORK — Legal wrangling over the route of TransCanada Corp.’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline through Nebraska continues, with both sides claiming temporary victory.

After a group of landowners won an injunction last week against a local law granting passage of the pipeline (amm.com, Feb. 20), TransCanada is claiming that the Nebraska attorney general’s appeal of the ruling shortly after keeps its route intact.

"This action (the appeal) stays the lower court decision, meaning L.B.1161 is still valid and the Keystone XL reroute in Nebraska that was evaluated by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality and approved by the governor remains in effect," a spokesman for the Calgary, Alberta-based pipeline operator told AMM via e-mail.

However, David A. Domina, lawyer for the landowners, said TransCanada is wrong in its interpretation of the law. "The defendant officials are bound to abide by this decision until it is altered by the Supreme Court," he said in a statement, meaning that "nothing can be done by the governor or other defendants until the Supreme Court speaks."

The proposed pipeline is still awaiting a presidential permit.




Latest Pricing Trends Year Over Year

Poll

Should AMM increase its news coverage of Mexico? Should this also include pricing assessments? And should this be available in the current AMM daily or in a new product dedicated to Mexican coverage?

Yes, write more about Mexico in the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico and launch/increase Mexican pricing assessments in the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico in a new product and not the current AMM daily.
Yes, write more about Mexico and launch/increase Mexican pricing assessments in a new product, not the current AMM daily.
No, leave things as they are and/or do not make major changes.


View previous results