Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';', to a maximum of 5

  • By submitting this article to a friend we reserve the right to contact them regarding AMM subscriptions. Please ensure you have their consent before giving us their details.

Ventures may ease trade cases, execs say

Jun 17, 2014 | 12:07 PM | Michael Cowden

Tags  AIIS, American Institute for International Steel, Richard Chriss, Gary Horlick, Artco Group, Jeffrey Himmel, John D. Foster, Kurt Orban Partners ArcelorMittal

NEW YORK — Joint ventures such as Valin ArcelorMittal Automotive Steel Co. Ltd. (Vama) could lead to fewer trade cases being filed in the historically contentious iron and steel sectors, according to some steel trade executives.

However, that’s assuming that the venture represents a trend that takes hold at world’s largest steelmaker Luxembourg-based ArcelorMittal SA, as well as more regionally focused U.S. companies, they said.

China has kept restrictive rules on investment in its steel industry, but a new status quo might be in the works, Gary Horlick, legal counsel for the Falls Church, Va.-based American Institute for International Steel (AIIS), said June 16 during a roundtable at the Steel Success Strategies XXIX conference in New York sponsored by AMM and World Steel Dynamics Inc.

"As that changes, you could well see a change in U.S. trade remedy activity against China," he said. "If U.S. steel companies were allowed to own majority shares in Chinese steel companies, they might act differently than now, when so far they haven’t been allowed to (own majority shares)."

Vama, which started operations in Hunan province’s Loudi city June 15, is 51-percent owned by China’s Hunan Valin Steel Co. Ltd. and 49 percent by ArcelorMittal. The 5.2-billion-yuan ($834.9-million) venture aims to capture 10 percent of China’s automotive steel market (, June 16).

Many trade petitions in the United States originate from the steel industry in part because it is—with the exception of ArcelorMittal—less international than other industries, such as the chemical sector, Horlick said. "There is an obvious constraint on bringing dumping cases against the rest of the world if you own production facilities there," he said.

Products made from iron and steel account for roughly 44 percent of all anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders, AIIS executive director Richard Chriss said. "And the other products aren’t even close."

Miscellaneous manufactured goods—such as furniture, magnets and hand tools—make up 18 percent of anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders, with chemical and pharmaceuticals coming in third at 15 percent, Chriss said. However, "you really don’t have the same level of political sensitivity (with those products) that you have associated with steel and metals," he added.

Contributing to tensions around steel is "massive overcapacity" worldwide, much of it state financed, and a North American market whose higher prices make it an attractive destination for imports, according to Jeffrey Himmel, president and chief executive officer of White Plains, N.Y.-based Artco Group International Inc.

"The logical answer is to reduce some of the overcapacity," he said. "But it’s easier said than done."

But Horlick questioned the extent to which overcapacity might be a problem over the long term. "Discussions of overcapacity all the way back 11 to 12 years ago did not envision China consuming 22 million cars a year and India as a potential market of the same size," he said.

Another factor that might help reduce trade tensions is overall economic improvement, according to AIIS chairman John D. Foster, who is also president of Burlingame, Calif.-based Kurt Orban Partners LLC. "We as a trading industry want to see as strong and as robust a domestic industry as we can," he said. "A rising tide lifts all ships."

Latest Pricing Trends Year Over Year


How will the US Treasury Department’s sanctions against UC Rusal affect the US downstream aluminium sector?

They will have a severe impact; companies might go out of business.
They will have a limited impact, but there will be some disruptions
They will have no impact, business will be unaffected

View previous results