Search Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';', to a maximum of 5

  • By submitting this article to a friend we reserve the right to contact them regarding AMM subscriptions. Please ensure you have their consent before giving us their details.

Schnitzer challenges shredder plans

Keywords: Tags  Scrap, Pacific Recyling, Schnitzer Steel Industries, shredder, Frank Haflich

LOS ANGELES — Schnitzer Steel Industries Inc. is challenging the right of a recycler in Eugene, Ore., to install its first shredder.

Pacific Recycling Inc. is looking to "break dirt" on a medium-size shredder sometime in the second quarter, Mark Losco, capital improvement manager for the privately owned company, told AMM.

Pacific Recycling late last year received favorable interpretations of city regulations that would allow it to install a shredder in a "heavy-use" industrial zone, according to company executives.

Portland, Ore.-based Schnitzer subsequently requested interpretations of city codes, arguing that Pacific Recycling’s installation of a metal shredder is not permitted in the industrial zone in which it is located.

A city official is expected to issue a decision April 11 affirming, reversing or modifying the earlier code interpretations that supported Pacific Recycling’s plans.

"We really don’t believe this is so much (a matter of) code interpretation," said Rod Schultz, Pacific Recycling’s owner, who views Schnitzer’s actions as intended "probably to keep one less person from installing another shredder."

A Schnitzer Steel spokesman could not be reached for comment.

Schultz, who founded Pacific Steel in 1985 and has one facility, said his company is not related to Pacific Steel & Recycling Inc., which is based in Great Falls, Mont., and operates throughout parts of the Pacific and Mountain Northwest.

An attorney for the city of Eugene, who said that Schnitzer had filed requests for code interpretations not only locally but on the state level, declined to discuss details of the dispute.

Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.


  • Mar 26, 2013

    big company trying to keep small company out. Isn't this the American way 2013? Bigger is not always better; just ask PSC.

Latest Pricing Trends