Search
AMM.com Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';', to a maximum of 5

  • By submitting this article to a friend we reserve the right to contact them regarding AMM subscriptions. Please ensure you have their consent before giving us their details.


AISI against Chinese plate in NY bridge

Keywords: Tags  American Iron and Steel Institute, New York Metropolitan transportation Authority, Verrazano-Narrows bridge reconstruction, Chinese steel plate, Tutor Perini, Thomas Gibson, Leo Gerard, Diane Savino Nicole Malliotakis


CHICAGO — The American Iron and Steel Institute has written to New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) asking its leadership to reconsider the planned use of Chinese-produced and -fabricated steel decking in its reconstruction of a New York City bridge.

The MTA awarded last fall the $235.7-million Verrazano-Narrows Bridge repair project to Sylmar, Calif.-based contractor Tutor Perini Corp., which subcontracted the manufacture of roughly 15,000 tons of steel plate to China (amm.com, June 21).

"At a time when our nation remains in a recovery from high unemployment and economic recession, we cannot afford to ship American manufacturing jobs overseas," AISI president and chief executive officer Thomas Gibson said in a June 26 letter to the MTA.

"Sourcing 15,000 tons of steel from China for repairs on the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge is particularly offensive, as the vast majority of Chinese steel companies are government-owned and -controlled and heavily subsidized," he said. "In addition, the Chinese government deliberately engages in unfair trading practices like currency manipulation to give Chinese exports an unfair competitive advantage. We urge you to reconsider the decision."

The taxpayers of New York who cross the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge "should not be forced to have their toll dollars go toward improving the economy of China when American manufacturing needs their support," Gibson concluded.

AISI’s objections echo those of United Steelworkers union president Leo Gerard, New York Sen. Diane J. Savino and New York Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis, who registered similar concerns last week.


Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.


Comments
  • B V Lakshminarayana
    Jun 28, 2013

    I think by going for cheaper products from China the US economy has come to this stage. That is how we lost all our textile and electronics manufacturing sectors to China. The letter clearly states how China makes its products cheap. We should be more concerned about our economy and not go by just cheapness. I think Justins arguments are unwarranted and unpatriotic. BV

  • Justin
    Jun 27, 2013

    As a New Yorker, New Yorks will complain even more if TPC purchase steel make in the US because it will cost 30% more. For example (and this is true) a bridge in Cali. was bid and the initial bid was ~$1.3B because of the buy america clause. The owner reject and revised the contract doc's that you can purchase foreign steel. The bid was awarded for ~$800M. This was all because of steel and there is a steel manufacture ~100mi from where the bridge was built. The reality is that it costs $500M more to make steel in the US and deliver it 100mi then it is for China to make it, transport it across the pacific, unload it in Cali. and transport it to the job site. It was disgusting to hear to truth and something has to be done!


Latest Pricing Trends