Search Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';', to a maximum of 5

  • By submitting this article to a friend we reserve the right to contact them regarding AMM subscriptions. Please ensure you have their consent before giving us their details.

Steel group calls emission plan flawed

Keywords: Tags  Obama, vehicle, carbon emissions, steel

CHICAGO – One of the three pillars of President Obama’s climate action plan is to cut U.S. carbon emissions by implementing strict fuel economy regulations for U.S. vehicles. 

“While this is a sound objective, the strategy to meet this objective is seriously flawed,” Lawrence W. Kavanagh, president of the Steel Market Development Institute (SMDI), said in a statement.

Under the plan, the Obama administration failed to consider total emissions during the entire lifecycle of a vehicle, instead focusing on the tailpipe, or emissions that occur while the vehicle is being driven, he said.

As vehicles become li
ghter and engine technologies advance, tailpipe emissions become a much smaller part of the total, according to SMDI.

Citing studies by the University of California-Davis and UC-Santa Barbara, Kavanagh said that emissions from materials and vehicle manufacturing can be half of a vehicle’s total emissions, but regulations that “ignore this significant portion of a vehicle’s total emissions” may not achieve the desired environmental result, particularly as vehicles become more fuel efficient. 

SMDI said it supports vehicle regulations that consider emissions from all phases of a vehicle’s life: manufacturing, use and end-of-life disposal.

“Many materials used for vehicle lightweighting and in alternative drivetrains produce such high emissions when they are made that they may not be overcome by savings during the driving phase,” Kavanagh said.

Considering tailpipe emissions alone may result in a net increase in vehicle emissions, which is “why the only way to ensure a reduction in emissions is to regulate total, or life cycle, vehicle emissions,” Kavanagh said.

Regulators in the United States and European Union “have fallen into the trap of waiting for each other to go first in implementing life cycle based regulations,” Kavanagh said. “The concepts are well known, so let’s work out the details to get it right.”

Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Latest Pricing Trends